"Home Run"- Electronically Hijacking of Passenger Jet Aircrafts by Military/Intelligence! (Deepak Sarkar, www.kolki.com)
[Background: NASA and Boeing repeatedly tested remote controlled landing of Boeing 737, 757, and 767 beginning with 1994 under Air Force supervision; World Trade Center (WTC) ownership was handed over, security under Kuwaiti Company compromised, kept without power for the convenience of placing strategic explosives for planned demolition by the experts. Prior to 9/11, Remote Controlled Global Hawk flew from California to Australia and CIA Drones were tested ready for Mission in Afghanistan. It’s all documented citing technological and logistical proof in the Book "Real Path To 9 11". There were no physical hijackers. All 9/11 Flights were delayed to take off (14-16 minutes) for the convenience of Remote Hijacking but Flight 93 encountered additional delay and got out of remote control on and off; that’s why it was shot down** by the military over Pennsylvania burying the secret that there were no Human Hijackers on the plane!
Though then Bush administration acted ignorant about the possible use of hijacked airplane as missiles, the fact is US Military, NORAD, FAA and DOT performed series of exercises scripting Hijacked Plane Hitting Buildings, sometime jointly with Canadian counterpart RCMP, before 9/11. Even FBI had its own similar exercise.
Pentagon’s Crisis Action Team (CAT) prepared a very assuring War Game Script before 9/11 where hijacked passenger plane would hit WTC! 9/11 was a meticulously coordinated event by the enemy within!]
Before 9/11, CIA (derivative of MI6 after WW II) had tested remote controlled Drones to hunt Bin Laden, Global Hawk made a voyage to Australia from California without a Pilot, and Boeing 737, 757, 767 were tested for remote landing by both NASA and Boeing’s military wing.
Fig. Boeing 737 conducts series of automatic aircraft touchdowns relying on a new precision navigation system.
a four-day period in October 1994, the idea was put to the test on Runway 35 at
NASA's Crows Landing Flight Facility in
Long before September 11, 2001, Utilizing Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) and related technologies FAA and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) sponsored auto landing runway approach and touchdown test flights during the mid-to-late 1990s using Boeing 700 series aircrafts including Boeing 757, 767 obtaining horizontal and vertical positional accuracies of just several meters or less of the Runway width!
9/11 sophisticated high tech perpetrators (CAT) merely chose the national way points (World Trade Center and Pentagon) as their landing targets!
four aircrafts used to carry out the
How Active and Vigilant were US Military Before & On 9/11 for the Success of the Coup Hijacking Boeing Jets Remotely to hit (D)GPS Controlled Targets Precisely using FAA implemented WAAS/LAAS Technology?
What is ‘Home Run’?
Transponder and ‘Home Run’: Technically a transponder is a combined radio transmitter and receiver which operates automatically, in reference to 9/11 relaying data between the four aircrafts and air traffic controls on the ground. The communication protocols provide a unique “identity” for each aircraft, which are essential to avoid mid-air collisions in crowded airspace, and equally essential for ‘Home Run’ controllers lock onto the intended aircrafts for remote control manoeuvrings. Once the correct aircraft has been located, Home Run “piggy backs” a data transmission onto the transponder channel and takes direct control from the ground. Per 9-11 commission time line, all 9/11 planes had transponders turned off during hijacking! This explains why none of the 9/11 aircraft sent a special “I have been hijacked” transponder code, despite multiple activation points on all four aircrafts. Because once the transponder frequency had already been piggy backed by Home Run, transmission of the special hijack code was rendered impossible. This was the first hard proof that the 9/11 target aircrafts had been hijacked electronically from the ground.
Helpless Pilots: Once control has been taken away from the ground using top secret computer codes (known only to top secret military and Boeing specialists), regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be recovered remotely forcing it to land at an airport of choice or programmed destination, with no more difficulty than flying radio-controlled model planes or military drones like Global Hawk. With reference to 9/11, the orchestrators selected World Trade Centre (WTC) and Pentagon as well as, probably Capitol/White House (aborted Flight 93) as the targeted destinations. All flights were delayed for convenience of remote hijacking! Unfortunately, Flight 93 encountered additional delay due to unpredictable traffic situation disrupting the rather precision plan. Donald Rumsfeld admitted it was shot down by the same people who hijacked the other planes.
How a pilot operates an aircraft? In order to control an aircraft in three-dimensional space, the pilot uses the control yoke (joystick) in front of him, rudder pedals under his feet, and a bank of engine throttles located at his side. Without engine thrust the aircraft would not fly at all, so for more speed or altitude the pilot increases throttle, and for less speed or altitude the pilot decreases throttle.
In order to raise or lower the nose of the aircraft, the pilot pulls or pushes on the control yoke, which in turn raises or lowers the elevators on the horizontal tail plane. To bank the aircraft left or right, the pilot moves the control yoke to the left or right, which in turn operates the ailerons on the outer wings. Lastly, to turn left or right at low speed or “balance” turns at high speed, the pilot presses the left or right rudder pedals as required, which in turn move the rudder on the vertical stabilizer.
Automated Boeing 757 and 767: Most modern jet air planes have automated flight management system which can be programmed to do everything a pilot would do and even more. On top of it Boeing 757 and 767 have “Home Run” option integrated with the Transponder to take that control from the ground, if and when necessary. That was probably the reasons why 757-200 had been Military’s choice as C-32A since June 1998 and 767 as KC-767 since March 2001. The 9/11 perpetrators knew all of these very well sitting at the top of technology and intelligence shrouded in secrecy and utilized it to justify 870 Billion dollars military spending implementing much anticipated “New Pearl Harbour” required for continuing US/NATO military domination of the world in peace time.
Why Pentagon’s Military Leaders Didn’t Use Anti-Aircraft Missiles Defense?
Now let us hear from then Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta testifying before 9/11 Commission "during the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and said to the Vice President, 'the plane is 50 miles out, the plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got to 'the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President...said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
Since the airplane was not intercepted and destroyed, even though the Vice President knew of it, "the orders" may have been to allow the plane to hit the Pentagon.
To confirm remote control hijacking from Pentagon on 9/11 imagine what novice Cessna trained box cutter armed alleged Al-Qaeda hijacker Hani Hanjour had to do to manoeuvre American Airlines Flight 77 that struck the Pentagon. It would require not only outfoxing military radar for over an hour but the quite miraculous performance of descending 7,000 feet in two minutes while executing a 270-degree banked turn and bashing into the Pentagon without touching or damaging the lawn, a feat of aeronautical magic, hitting precisely the newly refurbished part occupied by the Navy Seal, personnel as well as budget office.
Now let us hear former Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s recollection at 8am on 9/11 when Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and Representative Christopher Cox (R) were meeting in Rumsfeld's private Pentagon dining room, discussing missile Defense. Rumsfeld told CNN’s Larry King Live, “I had said at an eight o'clock breakfast that sometime in the next two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve months there would be an event that would occur in the world that would be sufficiently shocking that it would remind people again how important it is to have a strong healthy Defense Department that contributes to—that underpins peace and stability in our world.” [CNN, 12/5/01.
“Lt. Colonel Steven Butler has been suspended for writing a letter in which he called President Bush ‘a joke’ and accused Bush of knowing about the Sept. 11 attacks.” — The Monterey County Herald, 3 June 2002
In fact, then Defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld gave many hints (predicting New Pearl Harbour during inauguration, disclosing 2.3 trillion missing Pentagon Fund (to be used to run shadow government following 9/11) and telling the world shooting down of Flight 93 by hijackers(?)) which Media Mughals, analysts, scholars, and politicians chose to ignore for economic, geopolitical, Monarchial, and evangelical reasons – bringing otherwise peace loving world to the brink of World War III.
**WHY THEY (Military) SHOT DOWN FLIGHT UA 93?
The most scholarly analysis would suggest that the remote hijackers (Pentagon’s Crisis Action Team (CAT)) chose Airports and Flights very wisely so that the actual crash times were within an early hour window 8:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. on a Monday morning before Government works effectively yet to inflict massive casualty dubbed spectacular by then US intelligence Director George Tenet and counter terrorism czar Richard Clarke! They also chose sets of two adjacent prominent-popular public structures separated by hundreds of miles to divert public focus and attention. Thus Flight 11 and Flight 175, both Boeing 767, were delayed approximately 14 minutes so that they could hit the programmed targets WTC around 8:45 a.m. and (actual and 9:02 a.m.). Flight 77 and Flight 93, both Boeing 757, were also delayed conveniently so that they could hit programmed targets Pentagon and White House around 9:30 a.m. and The most wise speculation would be that Explosives were also timed in those building programmed around the intended crash timings. That is why Bomb exploded in Pentagon around 9:32 a.m. before the delayed plane crash.
But the remote hijacking started losing control with UA 93 on and off Beginning at 9:10 a.m. which led to Air Traffic Controller ( ATC) early rumours of losing UA 93! False threats to pertinent ATC also led to evacuation of ATC leaving emergency Transponder codes on the ATC screens from desperate pilots unattended and unanswered. Since the planned bomb(s) went off in Pentagon around 9:32 a.m. and remote hijackers experienced trouble with UA 93 they needed new strategy to reprogram Flight 77 hit Pentagon as quickly as possible passing over White House and taking a miraculous 270 degree turn at 500+ mph without rocking in absence of anti-aircraft guns from Pentagon or missiles from NORAD Fighter Planes following standard procedure.
Around 9:36 a.m., remote hijackers got back control of UA 93 over west of Cleveland, Ohio, and most likely reprogrammed for new destination as White House! “At 9.45 the Secret Service ordered the complete evacuation of the White House - United Flight 93 was still airborne and heading towards Washington. Agents ran from office to office screaming: "Get out! Get out now! This is real!" [William Langley, Telegraph, Dec 16, 2001. But they lost control again at 10 a.m. when they decided to shoot it down before it goes out of range and land somewhere!]
[They had to shoot down UA 93 to conceal remote military hijacking because if escorted by Fighters to nearby Military Base or Airport it would have been revealed that there were no physical hijackers].
• "Home Run” Electronically Hijacking the World
Trade Center Attack Aircraft,
Joe Vialls October
• March/April issue of "Tikkun" magazine, "a bimonthly Jewish critique of Politics, Culture & Society, Article by Dr. Griffin."
• 9-11 Timeline per Commission Report
• Book/E-Book, “Real Path To 9/11”, Trafford Publishing, March 2010.
Cold blooded murderers?
The 9/11 Commission concluded that in spite of an unprecedented attack threat in the months before 9/11, US “domestic agencies never mobilized in response to the threat. They did not have direction, and did not have a plan to institute. The borders were not hardened. Transportation systems were not fortified. Electronic surveillance was not targeted against a domestic threat. State and local law enforcement were not marshalled to augment the FBI’s efforts. The public was not warned.” [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 265]
(FAA Prepared American Air Space for Remote Controlled Operation long before September 11, 2001)
GPS-Guided Autopilot Systems on B757 and B767
Despite careful avoidance of the sensitive Remote Hijacking issue by the 9/11 Commission, US Politicians, and Media alike the information collected after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 has raised questions about the alleged ability and motivation of the people accused of piloting four Boeing 757 and 767 planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon building and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania; speculations have since lingered regarding the covert use of Flight Termination Technology to hijack and precisely navigate the four airliners to the intended targets that day disabling onboard pilot control.
development and implementation of pre-9/11 state-of-the-art systems capable of
facilitating precise automated navigation of the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft is
well documented by the
Augmented GPS signal service was developed during the mid-to-late 1990s by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Raytheon.
Wide Area Augmentation System or ‘WAAS’, is basically a continental DGPS system, ‘D’ stands for differential. It precisely surveys ground-based Wide-area Reference Stations that monitor and collect GPS satellite signal errors. Grounds based Wide-area Master Stations then transmit corrected GPS signal information to ground-based Ground Uplink Stations which then transmit the corrected GPS signal information to Geostationary Satellites. These satellites then broadcast the corrected positional information back to Earth for use within a GPS-like signal.
FAA announced2 on
GPS navigation for aviation
requires waypoints which are three dimensional locations within the US National
Air Space - comprised of longitude, latitude and altitude coordinates. An
aircraft flight5 path may include a series of waypoints6, e.g.,
To complete the system the FAA needed Local Area Augmentation Systems (LAAS) near runways. These would work like the WAAS but on a smaller scale. The reference receivers would be near the runways and so would be able to give much more accurate correction data to the incoming planes. With a LAAS aircraft would be able to use GPS to make Category 3 landings (zero visibility).
Utilizing WAAS and LAAS and related technologies FAA and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) sponsored auto landing runway approach and touchdown test flights during the mid-to-late 1990s using Boeing 700 series aircrafts including Boeing 757, 767 obtaining horizontal and vertical positional accuracies of just several meters or less.
Author: Deepak Sarkar, 844 Royal Oak Ave, Victoria, BC V8X 3T2, Canada;
May God (Universal Loving Expression) bless our world and guide all peace loving people to stand tall for revealing much needed truth for an eternal co-existence!
New Pearl Harbaour (9/11 Motives and Means)
9/11 State Crimes (Helpless Citizens)